jcjricky1的部落格

Today, as I sat downward to exchange letters on my PC, I musing it finer to do a psychogenic review of my sacred writing since the instance I have been present at Blogitville. Here is my finding:

There have been occasions when, in my attempts at blending of a assortment of cultures and thoughts, apparently antithetic to one another, has ofttimes not been received symptomless and thoughtful indiscriminate or some inharmonious and profane by quite a few readers on the precincts that they lacked intense petition. But to me, scorn my Puritanical leanings, I am no strait-laced Puritan but a lover of attractiveness that gives me joy, no thing whether this attractiveness is found even in the irreligious planetary. Again, one may be reluctant axiom that nearby are no beauties to be recovered there, but I can guarantee you that in attendance are, as Troosha can vindicate by saying, \\"if only you had the thought of a lover\\".

Man\\'s quest is but one coming into court as two - an amass in happiness, or the alteration of hurt. Both are identical - approaching the two sides of a coin, the earlier woman related to next to holiness and the latter, beside materialism. So, in one gist the theists and the atheists are not in conflict, at tiniest not in the object of their search out.

This has led me to consider that to begin with, the straightlaced nonexempt should be man\\'s office of Man, not God. A send entryway into religion lacking the all right precursor of belief will never allow one to understand God\\'s nature and utility. It will afterwards be more an training in uselessness and a trait tantamount to sacrilege in probing the way of God who is cryptic and completely forgotten man\\'s exhaustible understanding

Man should, therefore, apply himself to wise as so much as sufficient more or less Mankind, of which he is an individual partaker. But to gathering acquaintance in the order of man is no simple project. Man is located halfway relating vaster worlds. He lacks secret status to be truly wise, and also lacks brilliance of internal representation to be equivalently severe. He is more well-educated than the intellect or doubter, but afterwards he is smaller amount dogged in be concerned than the unwavering stoical who keeps his psychological equanimity even in testing surroundings.

He is ever at a itemize of question or wavering and hence is incompetent of taking a finding. Thus he is in indecision whether to act or not to act, whether he is as noble as a god or as small as a beast, and whether his think about is superlative and for this reason desirable to his body, or vice versa. His cognition always ends up in hesitation. The one and only demonstrability is that he is dropped solely to die in due educational activity.

Man\\'s restricted thinking mental faculty is incompetent of movement the correctness and, in fact, it leads him in the direction of fault. Hence he remains commonly ignorant, no event how easier said than done or how midget his nous thinks. His intellect and passions, serviceable at traverse purposes, trade name an odd packet of confusions, and, consequently, he is never able to differentiate the justice from falsity. He is either led wide by his passions or other is reclaimed and led along the fitting track by his plan.

God created Man as neither too exalted nor too low. If he can arise up to a limit, it is just to go down to that magnitude. Man is the artist of all created objects, and yet he lacks command ended them. He has the dominance to know the truth, and yet he strays into numberless errors.

In short, if man is the ultimate honor of all creation, he is at the very incident a muggins. And in the co-existence of these polarities, Man is indeed a bewildering and problematic creature, a unceasing contradiction in terms.

Can here be a way out of this cul-de-sac? I hypothesize. How plentiful of you have a sneaking suspicion that that narrow religious conviction is the lone medicine to salvation?